2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1999 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 268 kg more than 1999 Opel Omega.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (241 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1999 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Jeep | Opel |
| Model | Cherokee | Omega |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2597 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 241 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2740 mm |
