2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 6 kg more than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. (307 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Cherokee | MM |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 307 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 106 L |
