2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Cherokee | B3000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2520 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 74 L |
