2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (181 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 377 kg more than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (274 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Cherokee | Frontier |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 274 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 1654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 73 L |