2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2005 Maserati Quattroporte
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Maserati Quattroporte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Maserati Quattroporte would be higher. At 4,227 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 49 kg more than 2005 Maserati Quattroporte.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Maserati Quattroporte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Maserati Quattroporte (451 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. (343 Nm). This means 2005 Maserati Quattroporte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2005 Maserati Quattroporte | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | Cherokee | Quattroporte |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4227 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 451 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 90 L |