2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider

To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 210 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 654 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Cherokee. (307 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Cherokee 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
Make Jeep Mitsubishi
Model Cherokee Raider
Year Released 2008 2006
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3701 cc 3704 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 210 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 307 Nm 319 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1829 kg 1175 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 5590 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 3340 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.2 L/100km 14 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 83 L