2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, both 2008 Jeep Cherokee and 2008 Nissan Almera were released in the same year (2008). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,766 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 350 kg more than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Nissan Almera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (460 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Cherokee | Almera |
Year Released | 2008 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2766 cc | 1597 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 460 Nm | 138 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |