2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 711 kg more than 2008 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Jeep | Fisker |
| Model | Cherokee | Karma |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 36 L |
