2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2012 BMW 116
To start off, 2012 BMW 116 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 579 kg more than 2012 BMW 116.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 BMW 116. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW 116. (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW 116.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 2012 BMW 116 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | Cherokee | 116 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1949 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 51 L |