2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Commander. (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1755 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Lotus 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Commander | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | Commander | 16 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2305 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2260 mm |
