2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Jeep | Reliant |
Model | Commander | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 38 L |