2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1964 Rover P5
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1964 Rover P5.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Rover P5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Rover P5. (219 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1964 Rover P5 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Commander | P5 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 2995 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 77.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 105 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 52 L |