2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1965 MG 1100
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1587 kg more than 1965 MG 1100.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1965 MG 1100 | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Commander | 1100 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2412 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2380 mm |