2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1966 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (44 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1395 kg more than 1966 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1966 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Jeep | Wartburg |
Model | Commander | 312 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 43 L |