2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1450 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Commander | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2292 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2480 mm |