2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1974 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1202 kg more than 1974 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 NSU Ro 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1974 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Jeep | NSU |
Model | Commander | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1974 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2388 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2412 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 37 L |