2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1600 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Commander | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1242 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2310 mm |