2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 878 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Commander | 360 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3699 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 58 L |