2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1989 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 2,985 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 2150 kg more than 1989 Suzuki Swift.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Suzuki Swift. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Suzuki Swift. (112 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1989 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Commander | Swift |
Year Released | 2008 | 1989 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2250 mm |