2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (330 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1108 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (509 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Commander | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Commander | 100 1.4 D |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 89 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99.6 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 81.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1380 mm |
