2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (407 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Commander | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2490 mm |