2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1996 Suzuki Escudo
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Escudo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Escudo would be higher. At 2,985 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 2240 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Escudo.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Suzuki Escudo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Escudo. (156 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Escudo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Commander | 1996 Suzuki Escudo | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Commander | Escudo |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1590 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2370 mm |
