2008 Jeep Commander vs. 1999 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 808 kg more than 1999 Mercury Sable.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 1999 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Commander | Sable |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2986 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1602 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2760 mm |