2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2000 Pontiac Bonneville

To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 725 kg more than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Commander 2000 Pontiac Bonneville
Make Jeep Pontiac
Model Commander Bonneville
Year Released 2008 2000
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2985 cc 3783 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 510 Nm 311 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 96.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.7:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2355 kg 1630 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 5150 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]