2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2000 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1300 kg more than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville. (379 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Pontiac Bonneville.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2000 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Jeep | Pontiac |
Model | Commander | Bonneville |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 3785 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 379 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 54 L |