2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1440 kg more than 2000 Proton 400.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2000 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 2000 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2000 Proton 400 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | Commander | 400 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1299 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2510 mm |