2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 935 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision (530 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Commander | Vision |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 5439 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 355 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 530 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3230 mm |