2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2003 Mazda Washu
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Washu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Washu would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Washu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 994 kg more than 2003 Mazda Washu.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda Washu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Washu. (283 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Washu.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Commander | 2003 Mazda Washu | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Commander | Washu |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3500 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 283 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1416 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
