2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 505 kg more than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (410 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Commander 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Jeep Jeep
Model Commander Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2008 2004
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4701 cc 3966 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 229 HP 195 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 410 Nm 312 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.8:1
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2305 kg 1800 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.8 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 78 L