2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 680 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS. (350 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Commander | CLS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3498 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |