2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 967 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (500 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (300 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Commander | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Commander | Vision |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2412 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 62 L |
