2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Oldsmobile Alero would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 993 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (271 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | Commander | Alero |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3343 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1417 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |