2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Peugeot 607. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Peugeot 607 would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 880 kg more than 2004 Peugeot 607.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Peugeot 607. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Peugeot 607. (217 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Peugeot 607.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2004 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | Commander | 607 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2230 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |