2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Pontiac Aztek
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pontiac Aztek. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pontiac Aztek would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Aztek is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1184 kg more than 2004 Pontiac Aztek.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Pontiac Aztek. (285 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Pontiac Aztek.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2004 Pontiac Aztek | |
Make | Jeep | Pontiac |
Model | Commander | Aztek |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 3392 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 68 L |