2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 97 kg more than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Commander | Armada |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 5556 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 2507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |