2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Smart Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Smart Coupe would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (330 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1248 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
Make | Jeep | Smart |
Model | Commander | Coupe |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 730 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 33 L |