2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee

To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 576 kg more than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (307 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Commander 2006 Jeep Cherokee
Make Jeep Jeep
Model Commander Cherokee
Year Released 2008 2006
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2987 cc 3701 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 201 HP
Torque 510 Nm 307 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 90.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.6:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2410 kg 1834 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 2270 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.3 L/100km 13.2 L/100km