2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1281 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.

Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Commander 2006 Mazda RX-8
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Commander RX-8
Year Released 2008 2006
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2987 cc 1311 cc
Horse Power 0 HP 232 HP
Torque 510 Nm 216 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 73 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2410 kg 1129 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 2270 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.3 L/100km 11.8 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]