2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2006 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1370 kg more than 2006 Nissan Frontier.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Nissan Frontier. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Frontier. (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2006 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Commander | Frontier |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 3950 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 385 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 80 L |