2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2007 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. (322 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2007 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2007 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Jeep | Jeep |
Model | Commander | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3778 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90.8 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |