2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. Both 2008 Jeep Commander and 2007 Mercedes-Benz C are equipped with a 2,987 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 810 kg more than 2007 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 510 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2007 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Commander | C |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2987 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 17.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |