2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1153 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Commander 2009 Mazda 3
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Commander 3
Year Released 2008 2009
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2985 cc 1598 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 510 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 78.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 83.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.7:1 10.0:1
Acceleration 0-100mph 9 seconds 12.8 seconds
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2355 kg 1202 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.8 L/100km 9.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 55 L