2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,662 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1185 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL. (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Commander | GL |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 4662 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 460 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 92.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |