2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 6,208 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 584 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (630 Nm @ 520 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Commander | ML |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 6208 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 520 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2900 kg | 2316 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2130 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 95 L |