2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2010 BMW 116
To start off, 2010 BMW 116 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1040 kg more than 2010 BMW 116.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 116. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 116. (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 116.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2010 BMW 116 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | Commander | 116 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1995 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |