2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2010 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 592 kg more than 2010 Cadillac DTS.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac DTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac DTS. (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2010 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Jeep | Cadillac |
Model | Commander | DTS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 4600 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2936 mm |