2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1029 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | Commander | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 9 L/100km |