2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (410 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Commander | E-350 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 57 L |