2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2012 Audi R8 has manual transmission. 2012 Audi R8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Commander | R8 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 525 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.2 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 90 L |