2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (215 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Commander | Colorado |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |